I FULLY realise it can be frustrating for the Sue Ryder shop to have cars parked end on in front of their shop, indeed anywhere.

I also realise its expensive for barriers but I think the director of Riddle Holdings is completely missing the point of my original letter: the signs are no deterrent as they cannot be enforced.

Can I ask, if someone does park there, what does Riddle Holdings or Sue Ryder propose to do about it legally?

No, Driver of Cinderford does not look to park there – I was merely making an observation that they are pointless signs.

– Driver, Cinderford.